Seeking skunkworks and promiscuous library data is an article I should have linked to a few weeks ago. If you don’t know what a skunkworks is, the article has a helpful link (and now this one does too!). In short, the article posits that it would be easier to hammer out flexible user intercfaces if it were easier to get raw standardized data OUT of ILSes that do the hard work of circulation, patron, and money management, things that don’t need to look pretty, or as pretty. Very long, very well-linked and cited, very worth reading.
How do you make sure that the people who live in your dollhouse are (or seem to be) as well read as you are? You buy them dollhouse book covers, naturally. Legal, Egyptian, Mystery, these dolls read it all. I just tripped over these at Etsy.com but apparently there is a burgeoning market for mini book covers.
A few things have happened with the USA PATRIOT Act in the last week or so. The act was reauthorized, most of it indefinitely. Notably, Section 215 was changed somewhat and authorized for another four years. Library Journal has a blurb on how this affects libraries which is worth reading. I noticed that ALA President Michael Gorman had issued a statement about the reauthorization which had cycled off the main page of ALA by the following morning. I posted a note about this to the Council list (excellent archiving software that breaks all hyperlinks, huh?) and his response is back on the main page. Nothing on the main page of the Washington Office. Nothing on the main page of the Office for Intellectual Freedom, though both have fought against the USA PATRIOT Act since the beginning and do have a lot of information buried in their sites.
I was asked for a statement about the renewal and had been spending so much time with a close eyeball on my local Senators (who both voted against it) that I wasn’t entirely on top of it. You can hear a quickie interview with me on Moby Lives Radio (MP3 file). Suffice to say that I’m not mollified by the changes to Section 215 and I’m still concerned about this Act’s implications for the privacy of all library users.
Hi. It’s my Mom’s birthday today. Happy birthday Jessamyn’s Mom, the woman who instilled in me an early and eternal love of reading, helping people, and learning oddball trivia and other wacky facts. You can go check out her web page and learn where I got a lot of my general chutzpah and above-average writing skills. Her contributions on Flickr put mine to shame. I must note in the interests of fairness that I also get my bizarre sense of humor and my [insert adjective here] fashion sense from her as well.
I went to one of my many libraries yesterday to check out some books for my Mom’s upcoming visit that I thought she’d like. She gets up at the crack of dawn so I figured good reading material might be in order and my library has a great photography collection. Turns out that, like many librarians, I am a terrible patron and had a book that was way overdue. I had just returned the book but there was still a “block” on my card and the software wouldn’t let the desk staffer check a book out to me. The woman there couldn’t remove the block (“They won’t give me the override password”) and couldn’t let me check out any other books. This was not a fines issue since the library doesn’t have fines. I asked her how long it would take to remove the block and she didn’t know, “Maybe a week?” I asked her what the policy was on blocked accounts and she didn’t know and didn’t seem to really care. She wrote my home number down on a piece of paper and said the librarian would call me and let me know how to unblock my account. I checked out all my books on my boyfriend’s card. I wonder if there will be some sort of essay component to this unblocking procedure?
The only reason I bring this up is that I keep thinking about this photo that Jenny Levine put on Flickr. When I was a student library worker, I was on the other side of the desk in this transaction. The software would do something that I either didn’t understand or wasn’t deputized to fix. I’d have to make a difficult decision about whether this was worth calling the librarian at home. The patron would be told that their problem couldn’t be handled until the next day, or if it was the weekend, Monday. I know this isn’t true for all libraries, but many libraries have these arrangements where there are times the library is fully staffed by people who have the authority to solve problems, and there are times it isn’t. At one library I used to work with, whenever the director was on vacation we weren’t deputized to fix many problems. If the systems librarian was on vacation, we couldn’t fix anything that went wrong with the OPAC. Both of these women got four weeks of vacation, at least. At many libraries the web site can’t be changed to reflect current conditions at all, though this has been changing and changing rapidly in many cases.
As a librarian and library patron, I don’t expect to be treated any differently than anyone else in someone else’s library. However as someone who goes to many libraries both for work and not for work, I’ve seen systems that work, and systems that don’t work as well. When the systems don’t work, I often ask a lot of questions: is this a software problem? is this a staffing problem? is this a policy problem? is this a failure of imagination problem? is this a problem of one person who just needs to retire? is this a communication problem? is this a problem money can solve? As I’ve said before, I can handle slow change, but I’m often curious as to whether some of these interactions are seen as problems at all?