<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; tintin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/tintin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>what&#8217;s the real story behind Brooklyn Public&#8217;s removal of TinTin from the shelves?</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2978/whats-the-real-story-behind-brooklyn-publics-removal-of-tintin-from-the-shelves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2978/whats-the-real-story-behind-brooklyn-publics-removal-of-tintin-from-the-shelves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brooklynpublic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tintin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2978/whats-the-real-story-behind-brooklyn-publics-removal-of-tintin-from-the-shelves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not trying to start a flamewar here, just thinking that this NY Times blog piece about an old racist Tintin book may be a little off. According to the article&#8230; [I]f you go to the Brooklyn Public Library seeking a copy of “Tintin au Congo,” Hergé’s second book in a series, prepare to make an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not trying to start a flamewar here, just thinking that this <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/a-librarys-approach-to-books-that-offend/?hp">NY Times blog piece about an old racist Tintin book</a> may be a little off. According to the article&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>[I]f you go to the Brooklyn Public Library seeking a copy of “Tintin au Congo,” Hergé’s second book in a series, prepare to make an appointment and wait days to see the book.</p>
<p>“It’s not for the public,” a librarian in the children’s room said this month when a patron asked to see it.</p>
<p>The book, published 79 years ago, was moved in 2007 from the public area of the library to a back room where it is held under lock and key</p></blockquote>
<p>The article also has, even more interestingly, <a href="http://documents.nytimes.com/how-brooklyn-public-library-has-responded-to-book-challenges#p=1">some of the actual challenges filed by BPL patrons</a> in which the patrons&#8217; addresses are removed but their names and City/State information are published. If your name is unusual redacting your address doesn&#8217;t really protect your anonymity. I&#8217;m curious what the balance is between patron privacy and making municipal records available.</p>
<p><strong>update</strong>: I got an email from the patron whose name I used asking me to remove it. I have done so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2978/whats-the-real-story-behind-brooklyn-publics-removal-of-tintin-from-the-shelves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

