<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; recession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/recession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;well at least they&#8217;re reading&#8221; the role of the judgemental librarian in media portrayal of library use</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2663/well-at-least-theyre-reading-the-role-of-the-judgemental-librarian-in-media-portrayal-of-library-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2663/well-at-least-theyre-reading-the-role-of-the-judgemental-librarian-in-media-portrayal-of-library-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So hey, we&#8217;re in a recession! And one thing that the media seem to agree about is that people are flocking to their libraries more than ever. In fact, just like &#8220;man returns library book 75 years late!&#8221; the news stories about libraries getting busy when people are out of work aren&#8217;t even that blogworthy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So hey, we&#8217;re in a recession! And one thing that the media seem to agree about is that people are flocking to their libraries more than ever. In fact, just like &#8220;man returns library book 75 years late!&#8221; the news stories about libraries getting busy when people are out of work aren&#8217;t even that blogworthy lately. But people still send them to me and I still read them. Often they have good factoids like &#8220;During the Great Depression, not a single library closed&#8221; which I found interesting. That line comes from <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/38082709.html">this article in the Journal-Sentinal Online</a> with the fairly typical headline <strong>Libraries&#8217; many benefits rediscovered in hard economic times</strong>. Good, right? </p>
<p>I was enjoying reading about it until I hit these lines&#8230;<br />
<blockquote>Library directors report circulation spikes for last month of about 10% when compared with December 2007. &#8220;Escapism,&#8221; was Waukesha library director Jane Ameel&#8217;s concise speculation on the re-emergence of libraries&#8217; attraction. &#8220;I wish we were giving them <em>David Copperfield</em>, but so much of our business is in CDs and entertainment,&#8221; she said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you see where I&#8217;m going with this? This library director seems <strong>disappointed</strong> that people are going to the library to feel better and interact with materials that they enjoy. I&#8217;m disappointed because when I read that sentence I feel that the library director values Copperfield-reading patrons more than she values music-listening patrons. I&#8217;m sure she talked to the reporter for 45 minutes and that&#8217;s just what he decided to pull out of the discussion. And yet, I think we should be careful with how we talk about what we do. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d go totally over to the other extreme and say that a patron plugging his laptop into an external power outlet at the library after hours was &#8220;rediscovering the value of their library,&#8221; but it definitely sends a more positive message about how we view our patrons than the earlier quotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2663/well-at-least-theyre-reading-the-role-of-the-judgemental-librarian-in-media-portrayal-of-library-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We made 10 Reasons the Recession Will Rock Your Love Life!</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2259/we-made-10-reasons-the-recession-will-rock-your-love-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2259/we-made-10-reasons-the-recession-will-rock-your-love-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[librarysex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2259/we-made-10-reasons-the-recession-will-rock-your-love-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 4, Library-sex will make a comeback. This is, as I&#8217;m sure you know, the good news and the bad news for many of us. [via]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 4, <a href="http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/03/05/10-reasons-the-recession-will-rock-your-love-life.aspx">Library-sex will make a comeback</a>. This is, as I&#8217;m sure you know, the good news and the bad news for many of us. <small>[<a href="http://twitter.com/jazzmodeus/statuses/767279604">via</a>]</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2259/we-made-10-reasons-the-recession-will-rock-your-love-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

