<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; philbradley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/philbradley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>two notes about twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2640/two-notes-about-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2640/two-notes-about-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philbradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ttw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. I saw the Providence Public Library&#8217;s Twitter feed today and I like it. A mix of library information and links to their very amusing tech blog. I like it. 2. I just noticed Phil Bradley&#8217;s list reprinted over at Tame the Web. I&#8217;m in a weird position on Twitter because I&#8217;m followed by librarians, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I saw the <a href="http://twitter.com/provlib">Providence Public Library&#8217;s Twitter feed</a> today and I like it. A mix of library information and links to their <a href="http://provlibcomputerclass.blogspot.com/">very amusing tech blog</a>. I like it.<br />
2. I just noticed <a href="http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2008/12/choosing-who-to-follow-on-twitter.html">Phil Bradley&#8217;s list</a> reprinted over at <a href="http://tametheweb.com/2009/01/05/choosing-who-to-follow-on-twitter/">Tame the Web</a>. I&#8217;m in a weird position on Twitter because I&#8217;m followed by librarians, MetaFilter members and at least a good handful of real life friends and family. I follow maybe a ninth of the number of people who follow me. My feed is open so anyone can read it, but I can only follow so many people (and I do stay up to date on my Twitter feed pretty much always so this is important to me). Here is my version of Phil&#8217;s guidelines and there&#8217;s a sort of flow chart in effect here.<br />
a) Do they Tweet in English (or possibly Romanian but I&#8217;ve never seen this happening yet)? If yes, go to b.<br />
b) Are they spammers or hypesters (following over 5000 people? pushing a product?)? If not go to c.<br />
c) Do they update more than ten times a day? If so, they&#8217;re too high traffic for me. If not, go to d.<br />
d) Is their Twitterstream just an automated version of their RSS feed? If yes, subscribe. If no, go to e.<br />
e) Do they @reply to people as the bulk portion of their tweets? If so, they&#8217;re likely not interesting to me (for me Twitter is like a news ticker, not a conversation). If not, go to f, g and h and choose one. If none of these apply, then don&#8217;t follow.<br />
f) Do I know them or know why they&#8217;re following me?<br />
g) Do I find them amusing, astute, informative or otherwise intriguing?<br />
h) Do I want to direct message with them and find that I can&#8217;t because I&#8217;m not following them</p>
<p>In short, my sister&#8217;s Twitter feed is one of my favorites, followed sharply by a few bloggers I barely know and a few random librarians who amuse the heck out of me. Then there are 200 other people and all told I probably scan through 600-1000 tweets per day. This helps me feel less like I&#8217;m up here in the fortress of solitude when I&#8217;m in rural Vermont and helps me stay in touch with a lot of plugged in people in the profession. I send all of my Twitter-related &#8220;soandso added you as a contact&#8221; email to a special folder and scan through it weekly. If I&#8217;m not following you and you think maybe I might like to, please feel free to drop me a note and/or a comment. I&#8217;m not suggesting this approach for anyone else, but it works well for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2640/two-notes-about-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

