<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; openshelves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/openshelves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>open shelves classification &#8211; a project in search of a leader</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2324/open-shelves-classification-a-project-in-search-of-a-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2324/open-shelves-classification-a-project-in-search-of-a-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authoritycontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cataloging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[librarything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openshelves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timspalding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always thought that one of the troubles with librarianship was that there are always more great ideas and projects than anyone has time for or can get funding for. As a result we outsource projects to the people who have time and money and thus lose control over the end product. I have no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that one of the troubles with librarianship was that there are always more great ideas and projects than anyone has time for or can get funding for. As a result we outsource projects to the people who have time and money and thus lose control over the end product. I have no idea if Library Thing&#8217;s open source <a href="http://www.librarything.com/thingology/">Open Shelves Classification Project</a> is going to wind up looking like a library product or a vendor product, but I&#8217;m curious to find out. As Tim Spalding says &#8220;You won&#8217;t be paid anything, but, hey, there&#8217;s probably a paper or two in it, right?&#8221; I haven&#8217;t seen much chatter, blog or otherwise, about this just yet but I&#8217;ll be keeping my eyes open. Whether or not this project it ultimately successful, I think it&#8217;s an interesting grass rootsy way of looking at ideas of authority and rejecting the top down let-us-have-you-contribute-and-then-sell-it-back-to-you models we&#8217;ve been working under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2324/open-shelves-classification-a-project-in-search-of-a-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

