<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>weeding and noisy libraries, a community response</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1939/weeding-and-noisy-libraries-a-community-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1939/weeding-and-noisy-libraries-a-community-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[askme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mefi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metafilter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon Chamberlain&#8217;s VALIS blog points to a bunch of responses to the Wall Street Journal piece about what they see as aggressive weeding. He gives two nods to MetaFilter, one for the discussion about the WSJ thread [which I participated in] and one for a related thread in Ask MetaFilter asking when libraries started being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chamberlain.net.nz/blog/2007/01/05/wall-street-journal-on-best-sellers-vs-classics/">Simon Chamberlain&#8217;s VALIS blog</a> points to a bunch of responses to the <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110009472">Wall Street Journal piece</a> about what they see as aggressive weeding. He gives two nods to MetaFilter, one for <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/57493">the discussion about the WSJ thread</a> [which I participated in] and one for a related thread in Ask MetaFilter asking <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/54368">when libraries started being so &#8230; noisy</a>. One of my favorite things about these discussions is the interactions between librarians and non-librarians in a non-library setting. The other thing I like is that thanks to MetaFilter&#8217;s use of the <a href="http://gmpg.org/xfn/">XFN protocol</a> I can link to every library worker I notice in these threads as a &#8220;colleague&#8221; and then <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/usercontacts/292">keep track of their posts and comments</a>. Look at all those librarians talking to each other, and to their once and future patrons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1939/weeding-and-noisy-libraries-a-community-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
