<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>librarian.net &#187; archivists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/tag/archivists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SAA&#8217;s Equal Opportunity/Non-Discrimination Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2715/saas-equal-opportunitynon-discrimination-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2715/saas-equal-opportunitynon-discrimination-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[librarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archivists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a little &#8220;yay team&#8221; note, the Society for American Archivists has added language to their non-discrimination policy protecting people in “gender identity/expression,” “religion,” “sexual orientation,” and “veteran status” categories from discrimination. The policy is here with a strong support statement; some bloggish discussion here (and see the previous post linked form that one) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little &#8220;yay team&#8221; note, the Society for American Archivists has added language to their non-discrimination policy protecting people in “gender identity/expression,” “religion,” “sexual orientation,” and “veteran status”  categories from discrimination. <a href="http://www.archivists.org/statements/EOPolicy.asp">The policy is here</a> with a strong support statement; some bloggish discussion <a href="http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=246">here</a> (and see the previous post linked form that one) and <a href="http://archivesfound.com/2009/02/12/standing-up-and-being-counted/">here</a>. <small>[<a href="http://twitter.com/snarkivist7/status/1276133532">via</a>]</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2715/saas-equal-opportunitynon-discrimination-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archives + Blogs = ???</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1865/archives-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1865/archives-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archivists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markmatienzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretmirror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I went to the Society for American Archivists conference, one of the reasons I was invited was to be a positive presence and advocate for librarians (and by extension, archivists) using blogs, or at least paying attention to them. Many people told me &#8220;you think librarians don&#8217;t use technology, wait til you meet archivists!&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I went to the Society for American Archivists conference, one of the reasons I was invited was to be a positive presence and advocate for librarians (and by extension, archivists) using blogs, or at least paying attention to them. Many people told me &#8220;you think librarians don&#8217;t use technology, wait til you meet archivists!&#8221; I think there is a lot of competitive jostling in the multi-way tie for last place for &#8220;getting&#8221; technology in some of the helping professions, but as always, people are doing some neat things to sovle the problem. </p>
<p><a href="http://matienzo.pdp6.org/">Mark Matienzo</a>, who I saw at SAA and at Library Camp and managed to not say hello to, has a few neat thoughts and widgets. First, a post at hig blog <a href="http://thesecretmirror.com/">The Secret Mirror</a> about <a href="http://thesecretmirror.com/archivesblogs/responsetolannon">how he selects and thinks about archive blogs</a>. This is particularly interesting, because Mark is the maintainer of the <a href="http://archivesblogs.com/">ArchivesBlogs</a> site which aggregates the content of blogs by and for archivists. It&#8217;s also noteworthy as a resonse to <a href="http://bibliographical.wordpress.com/2006/09/13/archiveblogs/">this post by Thomas Lannon</a>, himself an archivist, in which he blogs about disliking blogs. How meta! Food for thought, as always.<br />
<blockquote>I have witnessed how blogging tends to suck the life out of people as they turn from multidimensional humans into single-minded RSS feeds. Blogging deserves a large amount of criticism even from those who do partake in it, as a technology it rests on flimsy foundations of emerging, changing tools and only a slim representation of people find time to write them. Constructive criticism is just and no matter how much I think blogging is purile, I still can’t help from posting these silly notes.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1865/archives-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

