<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: in case you needed another reason to raise an eyebrow at Elsevier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cloned Milkmen</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-124758</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloned Milkmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2809#comment-124758</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55679/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Scientist now reports that Elsevier admits to publishing 6 fake scam journals&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical journals, but did not disclose sponsorship, the company has admitted.

Elsevier is conducting an &quot;internal review&quot; of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s without disclosing that the &quot;journal&quot; was corporate sponsored. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
For their part, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_01203&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Elsevier execs claim they didn&#039;t know it was happening:&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
It has recently come to my attention that from 2000 to 2005, our Australia office published a series of sponsored article compilation publications, on behalf of pharmaceutical clients, that were made to look like journals and lacked the proper disclosures. This was an unacceptable practice, and we regret that it took place.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55679/" rel="nofollow">The Scientist now reports that Elsevier admits to publishing 6 fake scam journals</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical journals, but did not disclose sponsorship, the company has admitted.</p>
<p>Elsevier is conducting an &#8220;internal review&#8221; of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s without disclosing that the &#8220;journal&#8221; was corporate sponsored.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For their part, <a href="http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_01203" rel="nofollow">Elsevier execs claim they didn&#8217;t know it was happening:</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
It has recently come to my attention that from 2000 to 2005, our Australia office published a series of sponsored article compilation publications, on behalf of pharmaceutical clients, that were made to look like journals and lacked the proper disclosures. This was an unacceptable practice, and we regret that it took place.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick.librarystory.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Elsevier!</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-124711</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick.librarystory.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Elsevier!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2809#comment-124711</guid>
		<description>[...] in case you needed another reason to raise an eyebrow at Elsevier; librarian.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in case you needed another reason to raise an eyebrow at Elsevier; librarian.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HotStuff 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Word of the Day: &#8220;merck&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-124673</link>
		<dc:creator>HotStuff 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Word of the Day: &#8220;merck&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2809#comment-124673</guid>
		<description>[...] case you needed another reason to raise an eyebrow at Elsevier [web link]librarian.net (03/May/2009)&#8220;&#8230;scam journal sponsored by merck and internded solely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case you needed another reason to raise an eyebrow at Elsevier [web link]librarian.net (03/May/2009)&#8220;&#8230;scam journal sponsored by merck and internded solely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharp pain around the wrist area? &#124; Joint Specialist</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-124668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharp pain around the wrist area? &#124; Joint Specialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2809#comment-124668</guid>
		<description>[...] librarian.net » Blog Archive » in case you needed another reason &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] librarian.net » Blog Archive » in case you needed another reason &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloned Milkmen</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2809/in-case-you-needed-another-reason-to-raise-an-eyebrow-at-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-124629</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloned Milkmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2809#comment-124629</guid>
		<description>Much has been made out of the fact that this &quot;throw away&quot; (as some Docotor&#039;s call this type of publication) is not indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, etc.  However, it has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldcat.org/wcpa/ow/223430052&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;made its way into Worldcat&lt;/a&gt; and was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/57234&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cited by at least one online newsite&lt;/a&gt;.  Elsevier seems to be helping others to deceive: we need our vendors to help us develope trust-worthy sources of information.  Important questions are: what are the ISSN numbers of all the fake journals that Elsevier publishes?  Who else published fake journals and who is &quot;sponsoring&quot; them?  How often have these fake publications been cited unknowningly by scholars? I think a lot of people would be devastated if they discovered that they had cited a fake publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made out of the fact that this &#8220;throw away&#8221; (as some Docotor&#8217;s call this type of publication) is not indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, etc.  However, it has <a href="http://www.worldcat.org/wcpa/ow/223430052" rel="nofollow">made its way into Worldcat</a> and was <a href="http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/57234" rel="nofollow">cited by at least one online newsite</a>.  Elsevier seems to be helping others to deceive: we need our vendors to help us develope trust-worthy sources of information.  Important questions are: what are the ISSN numbers of all the fake journals that Elsevier publishes?  Who else published fake journals and who is &#8220;sponsoring&#8221; them?  How often have these fake publications been cited unknowningly by scholars? I think a lot of people would be devastated if they discovered that they had cited a fake publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
