<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ruminating about privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/2550/ruminating-about-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2550/ruminating-about-privacy/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2550/ruminating-about-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-121403</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2550#comment-121403</guid>
		<description>I think that it&#039;s important to think about the reasons why the public&#039;s perception of and concern for privacy might be changing.  One obvious reason is that there are more and more requests for our personal information from various companies and organizations - often these &quot;requests&quot; are really more like demands (e.g., you can shop without a &quot;Club Card,&quot; but you&#039;ll pay higher prices).  Also, we are seeing more and more public examples of other people sharing their information (i.e., Web 2.0), and that&#039;s an influence to start sharing ourselves.

Giving library-patrons the ability to &quot;opt-out&quot; of various privacy-compromising services is a good thing to do, but it&#039;s really not that different from what most commercial companies also offer.  We would not be part of the problem, but shouldn&#039;t we, as libraries, try to be part of the solution?  Unlike private companies, our goal is not profit (and profiting from our users&#039; information).  Rather, most libraries serve the public and are driven by principles (open access to information and intellectual freedom among them).  As such, I think libraries could go a step beyond the rest of the commercial world when it comes to privacy issues.  Rather than just have a small privacy statement hidden somewhere on our website, let&#039;s have a visible, ever-present link to a entire page devoted to educating our users on the issue of privacy.

A good book on the changing nature of privacy (and changing perception of privacy) is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/55077622&amp;referer=brief_results&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Digital Person&lt;/A&gt;, by Daniel J. Solove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it&#8217;s important to think about the reasons why the public&#8217;s perception of and concern for privacy might be changing.  One obvious reason is that there are more and more requests for our personal information from various companies and organizations &#8211; often these &#8220;requests&#8221; are really more like demands (e.g., you can shop without a &#8220;Club Card,&#8221; but you&#8217;ll pay higher prices).  Also, we are seeing more and more public examples of other people sharing their information (i.e., Web 2.0), and that&#8217;s an influence to start sharing ourselves.</p>
<p>Giving library-patrons the ability to &#8220;opt-out&#8221; of various privacy-compromising services is a good thing to do, but it&#8217;s really not that different from what most commercial companies also offer.  We would not be part of the problem, but shouldn&#8217;t we, as libraries, try to be part of the solution?  Unlike private companies, our goal is not profit (and profiting from our users&#8217; information).  Rather, most libraries serve the public and are driven by principles (open access to information and intellectual freedom among them).  As such, I think libraries could go a step beyond the rest of the commercial world when it comes to privacy issues.  Rather than just have a small privacy statement hidden somewhere on our website, let&#8217;s have a visible, ever-present link to a entire page devoted to educating our users on the issue of privacy.</p>
<p>A good book on the changing nature of privacy (and changing perception of privacy) is <a HREF="http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/55077622&amp;referer=brief_results" rel="nofollow">The Digital Person</a>, by Daniel J. Solove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auntie Nanuuq</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2550/ruminating-about-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-121365</link>
		<dc:creator>Auntie Nanuuq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2550#comment-121365</guid>
		<description>Privacy:

The library I work in now keeps Customers&#039; hold out on shelves (where once they were in the back room) in the Public Area of the library for them to be able to pick-up at will and charge out via Self-Check kiosks. Many of our long time customers are not happy with this practice and no longer want to place holds on items because they believe having their items shelved in the public area is an invasion of privacy. 

To insure their &quot;privacy&quot;...we now print only the 1st four letters of their last names and the 1st initial of their first name.  Then we wrap each and EVERY item in a piece of 8.5 x 11 piece of paper (sometimes recycled) and tape it closed!  This insures (?) that no other customer can see what other customers are reading/requesting.

Here&#039;s the problem: many times customers have the same first 4 letters and first initial of their names...so people inadvertently pick up and look at other peoples requests, or nosy people will merely, pull off the wrapper to see if there is anything new &amp; interesting that they want to order for themselves.  Thus jeopardizing &quot;privacy&quot;.

Time wise, it is now taking staff double the time to process holds.  Resource wise, we are using double the paper (Sirsi automatically prints out a receipt w/ the customer&#039;s full name and title on it), and excessive amount of tape.

Personally, I believe that privacy, use of resources &amp; processing time was optimum when we kept the Holds behind the Circulation Desk.

So what&#039;s a person to do...but move forward w/ the vision of &quot;self-service&quot; and Library 2.0 and hope that customers only peruse their own Holds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy:</p>
<p>The library I work in now keeps Customers&#8217; hold out on shelves (where once they were in the back room) in the Public Area of the library for them to be able to pick-up at will and charge out via Self-Check kiosks. Many of our long time customers are not happy with this practice and no longer want to place holds on items because they believe having their items shelved in the public area is an invasion of privacy. </p>
<p>To insure their &#8220;privacy&#8221;&#8230;we now print only the 1st four letters of their last names and the 1st initial of their first name.  Then we wrap each and EVERY item in a piece of 8.5 x 11 piece of paper (sometimes recycled) and tape it closed!  This insures (?) that no other customer can see what other customers are reading/requesting.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the problem: many times customers have the same first 4 letters and first initial of their names&#8230;so people inadvertently pick up and look at other peoples requests, or nosy people will merely, pull off the wrapper to see if there is anything new &amp; interesting that they want to order for themselves.  Thus jeopardizing &#8220;privacy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Time wise, it is now taking staff double the time to process holds.  Resource wise, we are using double the paper (Sirsi automatically prints out a receipt w/ the customer&#8217;s full name and title on it), and excessive amount of tape.</p>
<p>Personally, I believe that privacy, use of resources &amp; processing time was optimum when we kept the Holds behind the Circulation Desk.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s a person to do&#8230;but move forward w/ the vision of &#8220;self-service&#8221; and Library 2.0 and hope that customers only peruse their own Holds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2550/ruminating-about-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-121249</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/?p=2550#comment-121249</guid>
		<description>i was just thinking about this... 
i appreciate that you consider this subject more than most of us (esp the tech aspect) but some librarians don&#039;t explicitly make the distinction between the general value of privacy and then the right to privacy. they seem to want &quot;privacy above all&quot;. perhaps equating privacy and clearing of metadata?. patron 2 here isnt valuing her privacy in the same way as patron 1 is, though she may regard that as her right... and a hard fought for right. great topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was just thinking about this&#8230;<br />
i appreciate that you consider this subject more than most of us (esp the tech aspect) but some librarians don&#8217;t explicitly make the distinction between the general value of privacy and then the right to privacy. they seem to want &#8220;privacy above all&#8221;. perhaps equating privacy and clearing of metadata?. patron 2 here isnt valuing her privacy in the same way as patron 1 is, though she may regard that as her right&#8230; and a hard fought for right. great topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
