<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: speaking of Worldcat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaleA</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/comment-page-1/#comment-113390</link>
		<dc:creator>DaleA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/#comment-113390</guid>
		<description>The items not in WorldCat could fill another WorldCat, most likely. While explaining the OCLC database to a German researcher friend the other day, it struck me how it is still very, very Amero/Anglocentric. Sure, there are many non-North American libraries represented, but they are still a trifling compared to the massive amounts of cataloged material still undocumented in WorldCat. Too often, in the US, the criticism of the OCLC database focuses on titles in the NUC that never made it to the new age. They, too, are trifling compared to the data in catalogs in scores of countries &#039;undiscovered&#039; by OCLC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The items not in WorldCat could fill another WorldCat, most likely. While explaining the OCLC database to a German researcher friend the other day, it struck me how it is still very, very Amero/Anglocentric. Sure, there are many non-North American libraries represented, but they are still a trifling compared to the massive amounts of cataloged material still undocumented in WorldCat. Too often, in the US, the criticism of the OCLC database focuses on titles in the NUC that never made it to the new age. They, too, are trifling compared to the data in catalogs in scores of countries &#8216;undiscovered&#8217; by OCLC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genevieve</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/comment-page-1/#comment-113368</link>
		<dc:creator>genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2235/speaking-of-worldcat/#comment-113368</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links to the slow folk, Jess. I needed that today! I&#039;m reading too damn fast :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links to the slow folk, Jess. I needed that today! I&#8217;m reading too damn fast :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

