Does that include when the OIF specifically targets individuals for exclusion from legally mandated requirements? See http://www.safelibraries.org/unequalaccess.htm I suppose the ALA’s intellectual freedom is more equal than anyone else’s intellectual freedom.

And purposefully leaving Greg of Shush’s name off an ALA ballot was a masterpiece of election fraud. At least the ALA (SRRT) had the intellectual freedom to explain why it was denying another ALA member’s intellectual freedom. You are proud of that? See http://www.shush.ws/wordpress/?p=245 and the subsequent posts.

“One of the things I do on Wikipedia is keep the Library Bill of Rights free from soapboxing and point-of-view hecotring. It’s a tougher job than you might think.”

Was it really “tough” for you to be the person responsible for preventing me from helping to ensure compliance with Wikipedia policy by getting a gang to permanently block me from preventing the ALA’s use of Wikipedia as a professional propaganda tool against Wikipedia’s policy? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling#Why_my_banning_from_Wikipedia_by_former_ALA_Councilor_is_wrong

I mean talking about censorship, you and the OIF would know. I’ll bet you’ll even remove this comment like you have a few others of my comments.

Your comments here indicate to me that you regret the ALA does not have a larger cadre of people who patrol and correct Wikipedia and other such sites to ensure ALA propaganda trumps whatever rules to ensure accuracy are provided by the web site’s host. Truly, that is truly scary.