<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright notices, deceptive and otherwise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/comment-page-1/#comment-107069</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/#comment-107069</guid>
		<description>Well, CCIA is on &quot;our side&quot; on this one--as on many extreme-copyright issues. They&#039;re the big consumer electronics and PC companies; excessively tight content restrictions make it tougher to sell hardware. If you note Coyle&#039;s commentary, CCIA is taking legal action against fraudulent copyright notices--and that&#039;s consistent with CCIA&#039;s stance in the past. (I left a comment on Coyle&#039;s post; I&#039;m a little surprised she&#039;s not more familiar with CCIA, which has indeed been around for a very long time.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, CCIA is on &#8220;our side&#8221; on this one&#8211;as on many extreme-copyright issues. They&#8217;re the big consumer electronics and PC companies; excessively tight content restrictions make it tougher to sell hardware. If you note Coyle&#8217;s commentary, CCIA is taking legal action against fraudulent copyright notices&#8211;and that&#8217;s consistent with CCIA&#8217;s stance in the past. (I left a comment on Coyle&#8217;s post; I&#8217;m a little surprised she&#8217;s not more familiar with CCIA, which has indeed been around for a very long time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzzy</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/comment-page-1/#comment-107063</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2130/copyright-notices-deceptive-and-otherwise/#comment-107063</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an interesting paper on SSRN by Jason Mazzone on just this topic: &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Copyfraud&lt;/a&gt;.  He basically asks why there are such harsh violations for infringing owners&#039; rights but not similarly harsh ones for owners&#039; claiming rights they don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting paper on SSRN by Jason Mazzone on just this topic: <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244" rel="nofollow">Copyfraud</a>.  He basically asks why there are such harsh violations for infringing owners&#8217; rights but not similarly harsh ones for owners&#8217; claiming rights they don&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

