<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You ditched Dewey and replaced it with what exactly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-102000</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/#comment-102000</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but acting like librarians think totally in Dewey is silly.  We&#039;re much more likely to use the same kidsclick version as the kids.  Most of us use Dewey as a shelving mechanism to locate a specific book, but think of a whole section as &quot;Education&quot; or &quot;Medical&quot; or &quot;Travel.&quot;  If you put big signs with those words over the appropriate areas and tell people that the Dewey number is just there as a sort of address when you&#039;re in a hurry to quickly tell you exactly where on a shelf a book should be, I think you have the best of both worlds.

I wouldn&#039;t tell the 911 system they had to stop using addresses because most people who came to an area just wanted to browse and shop and didn&#039;t care exactly what the street address of the stores were.  Different people have different needs, and there&#039;s no reason you can&#039;t design for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but acting like librarians think totally in Dewey is silly.  We&#8217;re much more likely to use the same kidsclick version as the kids.  Most of us use Dewey as a shelving mechanism to locate a specific book, but think of a whole section as &#8220;Education&#8221; or &#8220;Medical&#8221; or &#8220;Travel.&#8221;  If you put big signs with those words over the appropriate areas and tell people that the Dewey number is just there as a sort of address when you&#8217;re in a hurry to quickly tell you exactly where on a shelf a book should be, I think you have the best of both worlds.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t tell the 911 system they had to stop using addresses because most people who came to an area just wanted to browse and shop and didn&#8217;t care exactly what the street address of the stores were.  Different people have different needs, and there&#8217;s no reason you can&#8217;t design for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Fulton</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-101919</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/#comment-101919</guid>
		<description>Sometimes it takes a child... Visit http://www.kidsclick.org , a kid&#039;s search engine. They have a neat little link at the bottom you can click on to see &quot;What does this page look like through a Librarian&#039;s Eyes?&quot; Toggle back and forth and ponder the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it takes a child&#8230; Visit <a href="http://www.kidsclick.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.kidsclick.org</a> , a kid&#8217;s search engine. They have a neat little link at the bottom you can click on to see &#8220;What does this page look like through a Librarian&#8217;s Eyes?&#8221; Toggle back and forth and ponder the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-101898</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/#comment-101898</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, I&#039;m supposed to read the facts and consider the Maricopa County&#039;s research-based decision to drop Dewey instead of blindly raging?  Where&#039;s the fun in that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, I&#8217;m supposed to read the facts and consider the Maricopa County&#8217;s research-based decision to drop Dewey instead of blindly raging?  Where&#8217;s the fun in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Range Librarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Techsource Post about Dewey</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-101734</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Range Librarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Techsource Post about Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/2098/you-ditched-dewey-and-replaced-it-with-what-exactly/#comment-101734</guid>
		<description>[...] I have to say when I hit &#8220;publish&#8221; for my Techsource post about post-Deweyfication last night I had no idea it would have 8 comments by this morning. I attribute that to Jessamyn&#8217;s link love, and thanks, gal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have to say when I hit &#8220;publish&#8221; for my Techsource post about post-Deweyfication last night I had no idea it would have 8 comments by this morning. I attribute that to Jessamyn&#8217;s link love, and thanks, gal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
