Comments on: Walt Crawford on what’s next for Walt http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/ putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:14:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: barbara http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/comment-page-1/#comment-91492 barbara Mon, 21 May 2007 17:05:55 +0000 http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/#comment-91492 This is awful. I never thought much of the way OCLC makes its decisions, but this really burns me. Did I say it's awful? It's AWFUL! This is so ...[fill in the blankety blank blank] This is awful. I never thought much of the way OCLC makes its decisions, but this really burns me.

Did I say it’s awful? It’s AWFUL! This is so …[fill in the blankety blank blank]

]]> By: jessamyn http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/comment-page-1/#comment-91471 jessamyn Mon, 21 May 2007 15:45:13 +0000 http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/#comment-91471 fixed! fixed!

]]> By: walt crawford http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/comment-page-1/#comment-91469 walt crawford Mon, 21 May 2007 15:38:55 +0000 http://www.librarian.net/stax/2048/walt-crawford-on-whats-next-for-walt/#comment-91469 Thanks for the post--but one teeny-tiny correction (sloppy writing in my post): I'm not 62 yet, but I will be by September 30. For now, I'm a child of 61. Thanks for the post–but one teeny-tiny correction (sloppy writing in my post): I’m not 62 yet, but I will be by September 30. For now, I’m a child of 61.

]]>