<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wikipedia: economies of community scale, cherish individuals first</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/</link>
	<description>putting the rarin back in librarian since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metametametadata</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/comment-page-1/#comment-18085</link>
		<dc:creator>Metametametadata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809#comment-18085</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wikiality&lt;/strong&gt;

Stephen Colbert enlists the aid of wikipedia in making his own reality. Wikiality I wonder if he knows that the process for defining reality that he defines is a true process? For more interesting analysis please see Jessamyn&#039;s post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wikiality</strong></p>
<p>Stephen Colbert enlists the aid of wikipedia in making his own reality. Wikiality I wonder if he knows that the process for defining reality that he defines is a true process? For more interesting analysis please see Jessamyn&#8217;s post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Munson</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/comment-page-1/#comment-16877</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Munson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809#comment-16877</guid>
		<description>Jessamyn: I&#039;ve long had a love-hate relationship with Wikipedia. I&#039;ve blogged about my thought and I&#039;ve participated on the site. Our Infoshop website now has its own open encyclopedia, so I&#039;ve seen all sides.

I think I&#039;m ready to give up on Wikipedia. The Colbert Report stunt just illustrated the real problems with Wikipedia, which I&#039;ve been experiencing this week as various assholes keep editing the entry on me to include unfavorable content. I could probably write an interesting article on all of the bizarre changes people have made to the Wikipedia entry on me. Wikipedia has no process to prevent anti-social behavior and if one tries to edit entries you just get burned by more assholism. 

The problems with Wikipedia are so massive that I&#039;m sure they discourage people from being involved who have good intentions, but don&#039;t have time for all of the Wikipedia subculture and petty nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessamyn: I&#8217;ve long had a love-hate relationship with Wikipedia. I&#8217;ve blogged about my thought and I&#8217;ve participated on the site. Our Infoshop website now has its own open encyclopedia, so I&#8217;ve seen all sides.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m ready to give up on Wikipedia. The Colbert Report stunt just illustrated the real problems with Wikipedia, which I&#8217;ve been experiencing this week as various assholes keep editing the entry on me to include unfavorable content. I could probably write an interesting article on all of the bizarre changes people have made to the Wikipedia entry on me. Wikipedia has no process to prevent anti-social behavior and if one tries to edit entries you just get burned by more assholism. </p>
<p>The problems with Wikipedia are so massive that I&#8217;m sure they discourage people from being involved who have good intentions, but don&#8217;t have time for all of the Wikipedia subculture and petty nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/comment-page-1/#comment-16871</link>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809#comment-16871</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great article! I did get a little sidetracked in the seventh paragraph or so when Scott said there were two reasons for criticism of Jimbo Wales: 

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Number one:  Along the process of putting together Wikipedia, he has put together an excellent vision but in doing so, while he&#039;s given over some of the responsibility to the Wikimedia Foundation and other parts, he has maintained control of Wikipedia.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; 

Good point, and then I waited for number two.... Thansk for linking to this (and to unalog!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great article! I did get a little sidetracked in the seventh paragraph or so when Scott said there were two reasons for criticism of Jimbo Wales: </p>
<p><em>&#8220;Number one:  Along the process of putting together Wikipedia, he has put together an excellent vision but in doing so, while he&#8217;s given over some of the responsibility to the Wikimedia Foundation and other parts, he has maintained control of Wikipedia.&#8221;</em> </p>
<p>Good point, and then I waited for number two&#8230;. Thansk for linking to this (and to unalog!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mita</title>
		<link>http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809/wikipedia-economies-of-community-scale-cherish-individuals-first/comment-page-1/#comment-16866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarian.net/stax/1809#comment-16866</guid>
		<description>To me, the strongest critique I&#039;ve read about Wikipedia is Jason Scott&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cow.net/transcript.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Failure of Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; that I learned about through &lt;a href=&quot;http://unalog.com/search?q=wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unalog&lt;/a&gt;.   After reading Scott&#039;s piece I couldn&#039;t help but think that Wikipedia will eat itself. It will be a victim of its success and turn into Usenet. 

Wikipedia has been nagging at me for sometime now. I love it. I hate it. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newjackalmanac.ca/newjacklibrarian.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ve been rambling on about it&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the strongest critique I&#8217;ve read about Wikipedia is Jason Scott&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cow.net/transcript.txt" rel="nofollow">The Great Failure of Wikipedia</a> that I learned about through <a href="http://unalog.com/search?q=wikipedia" rel="nofollow">unalog</a>.   After reading Scott&#8217;s piece I couldn&#8217;t help but think that Wikipedia will eat itself. It will be a victim of its success and turn into Usenet. </p>
<p>Wikipedia has been nagging at me for sometime now. I love it. I hate it. <a href="http://www.newjackalmanac.ca/newjacklibrarian.html" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ve been rambling on about it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

